The Fromson File

By now, every journalist, official, professor and think tank guru within sight of Afghanistan has had an explanation for coping with the war. They’ve analyzed every aspect of the problem. But most of the solutions have been as clear as mud. Get out, stay in — no wonder that the public truly isn’t confused. It hardly can agree on what the United States should to do about a conflict that is costing American lives, not to speak of billions of dollars and declining support of an unpopular war. The state of the economy and the cost of health care are uppermost in the minds of most people.

On Tuesday evening, the outstanding PBS documentary, Frontline, examined what it described as “Obama’s War.” So it is, given the President’s earlier support of the conflict.. The high-level meetings that are underway with his senior advisors at the White House may produce a solution. But, it won’t please everyone.

Even the best reportage, first on Iraq and now Afghanistan by Frontline, is seen through a measured lens. Hardly a Taliban image or voice was seen or heard. The American point of view supporting the war got plenty of air time. The ever-confident Richard Holbrooke, President Obama’s special envoy in Afghanistan and Pakistan, headed the list of those who generally reflected the U.S. perspective.

General Stanley McChrystal, whose thankless job is to win the war, articulated the problems inherent in the counter-insurgency scheme of things. But he did not say on camera what he has been saying in private for the past two weeks; that at least 40,000 more troops are needed if the Taliban are to be defeated. The echoes of General William Westmoreland’s plea more than 40 years ago for an additional 206,000 troops in Vietnam came back to haunt me. Victory eluded him nonetheless which could be McChrystal’s fate too if President Obama endorses his request.

McChrystal’s recommendation reminded me of the warning expressed by three prominent figures associated with the Vietnam conflict. General Creighton Abrams, the late Army Chief of Staff; Caspar Weinberger, the former Defense Secretary and General Colin Powell, the onetime chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, all declared that the United States should never again involve itself in a major war without the overwhelming support of the American people. So far, an estimated 51% of the nation is opposed to the war, but that is hardly overwhelming.

Just like the Marines at the battle of Hue learned more than 40 years ago, guns alone could not defeat the enemy. The Marines unleashed enormous fire and air power in an effort to dislodge the North Vietnamese who were dug in from inside the walls of The Citadel in the center of the old Vietnamese capital. It was only after the Communists decided to withdraw that the fighting ended.

In Afghanistan, the gallant young men of Echo Company of the 24th Marines were shown unloading their firepower on the Taliban. But rarely, if ever, were the insurgents seen firing back from the ill-defined underbrush. Nonetheless, they were able to inflict troubling casualties on the Marines.

[Read more →]

Tags: No Comments.

Not in many years has television given the American viewing public an example of as impressive a documentary as Home Box Office did Monday evening with the airing of “The Last Truck: the Closing of a GM Factory.”

It was absent the voice and presence of a prominent network anchorman or voice-over narrations by another reporter. It had none of the silly questions that permeate so much of contemporary television reporting. Moreover, it was not the kind of hit and miss reportage that has been so common on television during the economic downturn these past few years. Instead, it made room for the voices and faces of real people, the workers of the GM truck factory in Moraine, Ohio, who had given the best part of their lives to building and assembling American vehicles that were rolling off the production line for the last time. The death knell was to be sounded two days before Christmas 2008.

Steve Bognar and Julia Reichert headed the team of producers, directors, editors, cameramen and women who put their souls into making this hour-long film. It was not anger as much as disappointment and quiet bewilderment that they captured about the future lives of the men and women, whose own parents had assembled GM trucks before them. For these white and African American workers, this was not the kind of retirement they expected. Nonetheless, their pride in producing an American vehicle on its last day, was a compelling moment. They were proud of their membership in the United Auto Workers Union whose negotiations with GM ensured them decent salaries, benefits and pensions. Or so they thought.

“The Last Truck” was nothing less than a portrait of the nation”s work force under siege. If tears came to the eyes of some of the GM workers, it would have been difficult for people watching at home not to have shed a few tears as well, hearing and watching blue collar Americans describe the last painful weeks and hours of jobs they thought would never end. What was not remarkable to me, but may have been to most people sitting at home, was the sensitivity and clarity of the workers, none of whom had more than a high school education.

It was not surprising to me because over the years as a reporter I have interviewed countless working class Americans on automobile assembly lines or in the farm belt of the country. They have never failed to impress me with their native intelligence, but in saying farewell to each other, they displayed an uncommon bonding that crossed racial lines and showed a remarkable love for each other. That may not have been anticipated by journalists who grew up in urban America and approach stories like this with some pre-conceived notions about how working class people could or would express themselves in the worst as well as the best of times.

Tags: 1 Comment

The United States has never before had a Foreign Legion like the hired guns the French used as enforcers during the days when the tri-color flew over their colonial empire in the 19th and 20th Centuries. They were soldiers of fortune, cherry-picked from some of the most ruthless military resources anywhere in the world. In short, many of them were scumbags for which the French took little public credit. The less they knew of these recruits, the better.

If President Obama is beginning to look like a wimp, pre-occupied with bi-partisanship, now’s the time to show the American people they’re wrong. He can do that immediately by putting the brakes on the legion of private contractors recruited by the Pentagon to do the kind of work it would not dare assign to American GIs in Afghanistan. According to the New York Times there are far more of these hired guns doing America’s bidding than soldiers who would be under stricter constraints if they were in uniform. From what we know of President Obama, we cannot believe he wants to have anything to do with a legion of foreigners who are not answerable to U.S. military commanders.

According to the Congressional Research Service, the Times reported Wednesday, 57 percent of the Pentagon’s force in Afghanistan consist of private contractors. They may be from the notorious Blackwater company, now known as Xe Services recruited by the Bush/Cheney Administration that made its name during the Abu Ghraib scandal in Iraq. It is not clear whether or not companies like Dyncorp International or ArmorGroup which is owned by Wackenhut Services are spinoffs from Blackwate/Xe or in some way are affiliated with them. For sure, the private contractors over the past two years consist of 65% of the non-military on duty in Afghanistan. Over the past two years, the figure would be even higher. What’s clear is that each of these companies is being paid six figures that are difficult to track down.

[Read more →]

Tags:   afghanistan · al qaeda · barack obama · blackwater · osama bin laden · Taliban · xeNo Comments.

One of the lessons a political reporter learns early in life is never to underestimate greatness. Case in point: Ted Kennedy. I’m sure that none of my colleagues covering his early emergence on the national horizon in the 1960s bet on him as a promising young star, even when the lives of his brothers were ended by assassins.

I first met Teddy in 1960 when we were traveling the western United States; he as a pol and me as a reporter. He was trying to solidify the delegate count for Jack Kennedy before the opening of the Democratic National Convention in Los Angeles. I was trying to do likewise for NBC News. Inside the convention hall, I was standing with the Wyoming delegation alongside Bobby Kennedy on the first ballot vote count when Jack was within eight votes of winning the nomination. Bobby yelled at the state chairman, “OK J.J., it’s s—t or get off the pot!” Faced with an eight to eight split between Kennedy delegates and those for Stuart Symington, chairman McCracken canvassed the delegates and explained that they had the opportunity to assure Kennedy the nomination. The Symington delegates switched, and Wyoming captured the national spotlight for having given Kennedy the first ballot nomination. For Bobby, it was a political triumph. Nobody, however, paid any attention to the other brother standing alongside — Teddy.

I did not see the youngest Kennedy brother until 1965 when I was covering Southeast Asia for CBS News and Ted showed up in Bangkok a year after having won a controversial U.S. Senate seat in Massachusetts that was once held by President Kennedy. Ted was considered an opportunist, unqualified for the Senate seat who won election only because of his Kennedy name. Later, Chappaquiddick and other mishaps or controversies hounded him throughout his career in public life, all of which made his desire for the presidency highly unlikely.

[Read more →]

Tags:   bangkok · cbs news · John F. Kennedy · Lyndon Johnson · moscow · Robert F. Kennedy · Ted KennedyNo Comments.